Migrating from Zapier to Make (Integromat)

When it comes to automating processes and exchanging data between web applications, there are several solutions available on the market. Two of the most popular are Zapier and Make (Integromat), each offering its own unique features and benefits. In this article, we will take a closer look at what sets these two automation tools apart and why you may want to consider switching from Zapier to Make.

Zapier has long been a favorite among users for its simple, yet powerful automation capabilities. It connects web applications with a series of "Zaps" and can automate a wide range of tasks, from simple data transfers to complex workflows. However, as Zapier has grown in popularity, a number of alternatives have emerged, each offering their own set of advantages.

The main limitation of Zapier is that of it's linear workflows, which don't allow for much branching based on conditions

Make offers many more powerful features

The primary and most robust alternative is Make, a comprehensive automation tool that offers a range of features and functionalities beyond what Zapier provides. Unlike Zapier, Make offers a more visual interface for building and managing automations, which makes it easier for users to create complex workflows. Additionally, Make provides a number of advanced features, such as looping and conditional statements, that allow for even greater flexibility in automating tasks and working with more complex sets of data.

Another advantage of Make is its cost structure. While Zapier charges based on the number of tasks completed each month, Make offers a flexible pricing model that allows users to scale their automation needs as needed. This means that users can automate as many tasks as they need without worrying about incurring additional costs. Overall Make ends up being a cheaper option for almost all users.

In terms of the editor, one of the most powerful features in Make is the use of Routers, which allow for limitless branching of workflows.

The interface of Make is modular, which displays the process and workflow through the arrangement of separate modules. Additionally, users can easily add additional modules at any time through a simple drag-and-drop process.

Error handling is also made easy with Make, as you can quickly identify where errors occur and eliminate them. Furthermore, you have the option to specify who should be notified about specific errors in your workflow. With Make, you also have the flexibility to exchange individual modules, including the starting trigger, allowing for continuous adaptability and the ability to duplicate your processes as needed.

Here are a few of the features Make supports not currently available in Zapier:

• Handling of files through manipulation and archiving

• Scheduling scenarios for specific days and times

• Automatic error handling and the option to stop scenarios upon the detection of an error

• Splitting and merging data using iterators and aggregators

• The flexibility to choose the starting point for processing data

• Parsing and manipulating HTML, and scraping data from websites

• Dynamic mapping with functions and operators for variable mapping

• Math functions similar to those found in spreadsheets

• URL encoding and decoding within text and binary functions

• Array manipulation, JSON/XML parsing, serialization, cycles, and transactions.

When considering a switch from Zapier to Make, it's important to plan carefully and ensure that you have a clear understanding of your automation needs. Make sure to carefully evaluate your existing workflows and determine which automations are most critical to your business. Additionally, consider the integrations that you currently use and ensure that they are supported by Make. While both have integrations with hundreds of the most popular apps and systems, there isn't 100% overlap.

Complexity

Another important factor to consider is the learning curve associated with using Make. While Make is designed to be user-friendly, it does require a deeper understanding of automation concepts and a willingness to learn how to use its advanced features. However, for those who are willing to invest the time and effort, the rewards can be substantial, including increased efficiency, better automation, and lower costs.

In conclusion, if you are looking for a powerful and flexible automation tool that can help you streamline your workflows and improve your productivity, Make may be the solution you are looking for. With its advanced features, flexible pricing, and extensive integrations, Make is a great alternative to Zapier and well worth considering for your automation needs.

If you are looking to make the Switch, we've performed hundreds of migrations from Zapier to Make and can help you too. Contact us.