New:Thread Pilot—AI follow-ups for Gmail.
Learn more

Resources

IFTTT vs. Zapier: Decoding the Major Differences in Automation Tools

Discover the key distinctions between IFTTT and Zapier, two leading automation tools that cater to different user needs and preferences. Learn which platform is more suited to your personal or business automation tasks in our comprehensive comparison.

January 1, 1970

In today's fast-paced digital environment, productivity and workflow automation tools like IFTTT and Zapier have become indispensable to both individuals and businesses looking to streamline their online activities. IFTTT, which stands for If This Then That, and Zapier are platforms that connect various apps and services to automate an array of tasks, but they cater to different user needs and preferences.

The major difference between IFTTT and Zapier lies in their complexity and target audience. IFTTT is known for its simplicity and user-friendly approach. It is geared towards consumers seeking straightforward recipes or applets that trigger actions between devices, apps, and services for personal use or smart home automation. For example, if you post a picture on Instagram (the “if this”), an IFTTT applet can automatically save that photo to your Dropbox (the “then that”).

On the other hand, Zapier focuses on a more professional, business-oriented audience, offering a wider selection and more intricate Zaps that can automate complex workflows across multiple applications. It supports a vast number of integrations and allows users to create multi-step Zaps which perform several actions from different services after one trigger event. For example, when you receive a new email with an attachment in Gmail (the trigger), Zapier can automatically save the attachment to Google Drive, then alert your team on Slack about the new file.

Another distinctive factor is the pricing model and number of integrations available. While both platforms offer free versions, IFTTT's free plan is generally more limited in the number of applets you can create, whereas Zapier offers a more generous free tier with a certain number of tasks per month. However, for more advanced needs, Zapier’s premium subscription scales up in cost according to the number of tasks, while IFTTT offers a flat rate for its Pro version.

In conclusion, choosing between IFTTT and Zapier will largely depend on the complexity of the tasks you need automated and whether they are for personal or professional use. IFTTT’s simplicity is perfect for straightforward personal automation, while Zapier’s robust platform is ideal for businesses needing to automate complex workflows across multiple services.

Contact

Tell us what you're building and we'll get in touch fast

Ship a proof-of-concept, integrate Metro2, or hand off the workflow entirely—we respond within one business day and loop in the right Switch Labs partner for your stack.

Response Time
< 24 hours
Delivery Options
Product | Services

By submitting you agree to let Switch Labs contact you about relevant products and services.